wheel of fortune geniusLet’s be honest – we’ve all watched Wheel of Fortune with our friends and done our best to scream out the correct answers before anyone else. But we highly doubt any of you hold a candle to the skills of last Friday’s contestant Robert Santoli.Santoli, who reportedly did a great deal of research ahead of the show, took home over $76,000 in prizes after dominating the contest. He was able to solve virtually every puzzle – and did so on one with just one letter showing. Prepare yourself for one of the more ridiculous videos you’ll ever see.According to FOX Sports, Santoli was eventually asked by host Pat Sajak to let the other players have a chance. Impressive, to say the least. It’s too bad he can’t return to the show – like he could if it were Jeopardy. He’d be a celebrity by now. read more

The series will still air here, as promised, in two-hour chunks, four consecutive Sunday nights at 9 on History, starting April 10.Down south, the controversy continues. There’s a reason, production costs and tax incentives aside, that both of these much-contested efforts came all the way up to Canada to shoot (The Kennedys here; The Reagans in Montreal). In 2003, the CBS network was pressured into dropping their already shot and scheduled TV movie, The Reagans, by pre-emptively outraged historians, prominent conservatives and Reagan friends and family. It ended up airing, without further incident, on the cable channel Showtime.History repeated itself when Discovery History (not related to our own History Television) decided to drop its own eight-hour miniseries, The Kennedys, sending its producers scrambling unsuccessfully from network to network, until they found it a new U.S. home on the obscure movie service ReelzChannel. LEAVE A REPLY Cancel replyLog in to leave a comment Advertisement Advertisement Americans take their dead presidents very seriously, particularly in terms of how they are portrayed on TV.Living fictional presidents are fine: Martin Sheen on West Wing, Geena Davis in Commander in Chief, Dennis Haysbert and Cherry Jones on 24.But the martyred John F. Kennedy, and before him, the dying Ronald Reagan — venture there at your peril. Advertisement Facebook Login/Register With: Twitter read more

Apparent attempts to extort two major Canadian banks highlight the increasing threat and variety of cyberattacks against major companies.Attacks against BMO and CIBC-owned Simplii — that compromised the information of up to a combined 90,000 Canadians — made public Monday, appear to be the latest in a number of high-profile ransom attacks. The attacks have the banks in damage control mode, prompting them to assuage client concern about the safety of Canadian accounts.CBC reported that it received a letter from someone who said they demanded a $1-million ransom from the targeted banks.The banks would not confirm the CBC report Tuesday. BMO said only that a “threat” was made, but it has a policy of not making payments to fraudsters, while Simplii was similarly cryptic, saying only that fraudsters may have electronically accessed some data, but that its practice is not to pay ransom demands.Both banks said they both took additional security measures after learning of the potential breach and would be directly contacting customers whose accounts may have been compromised. Royal Bank, Scotiabank and Toronto-Dominion Bank have said they have no indication they have been affected.The apparent extortion attempt against BMO and CIBC’s direct-banking brand Simplii comes after a string of other high-profile pay-for-data attempts.Recent examples include a failed attempt at Uber to pay off hackers — only for the company to later reveal that some 815,000 Canadians had their information compromised as part of a global attack, and the infamous cyberattack on cheating website Ashley Madison, which did not comply with hackers’ demands to close the website, resulting in the exposure of personal information of millions of users.Smaller organizations are also falling victim to hacking payment scams, including the University of Calgary, which paid $20,000 to have its computer systems unlocked after a ransomware attack in 2016.The risks are clearly on the rise, said cybersecurity expert Satyamoorthy Kabilan at the Conference Board of Canada.“In terms of cyber incidents overall, whether it’s breaches, whether it’s these sorts of attacks, whether it’s standard ransomware, that’s skyrocketing.”However, the incident involving BMO and Simplii varies from more standard efforts to either use the data itself to profit or to try and sell it to third parties — which makes it harder for companies to set up defensive plans, said Kabilan.“Understanding tactics actually gives us an advantage in terms of defending ourselves, but if those are constantly varying, it starts putting up a few more challenges.”Companies, especially banks, need to keep improving security efforts but also plan for resiliency and being able to respond in the event of an attack, he said.“Companies have to wake up to the fact that there is no such thing as 100 per cent security in the cyber world. It’s a question of when and how bad.”BMO and Simplii did the right thing in being quick to assure customers that their money is safe and that they’re working diligently to improve security, said Barry Waite, chair of the communications department at Centennial College.Both banks said they’d directly reach out to affected customers and are co-ordinating with officials to respond to the incident and protect clients.Demonstrating the safety of banking services will become increasingly important as they roll out more digital products, said Waite.“This is important for the whole banking industry, demonstrating that as they increase technology, they’re introducing new apps, that they have the best security in place.”The whole banking sector is looking to improve digital security in light of such threats, Scotiabank CFO Sean McGuckin said on a media conference call discussing its quarterly results.“There’s a very open dialogue amongst financial institutions around cyber threats. So we are all quite open and learning and sharing from each other.” read more

HALIFAX – A new report is calling for fundamental changes in how trees are harvested in Nova Scotia — including a reduction in clearcutting, a controversial practice that fells large stands of forest.The report released Tuesday by University of Kings College president Bill Lahey says forest practices should be guided by a new paradigm called “ecological forestry” which treats forests “first and foremost” as ecosystems.It says the province should adopt a so-called triad model that sees some areas protected from all forestry; some forests dedicated to high production forestry including clearcutting; and areas that are harvested with a “lighter touch” and limited clearcutting.Although he didn’t say it in his report, Lahey was unequivocal when asked whether there is currently too much clearcutting in Nova Scotia.“Yes,” he said.“There is too much happening where it should not happen … and the consequences of that is a continuing reduction in the proper functioning of the ecosystems and the biodiversity that are dependent on our forestry.”Lahey’s report says clearcutting would be acceptable in some even-aged forests of predominantly single softwood species. However, Lahey says alternatives to clearcutting should generally be used where the forest is of the mixed-species, multi-aged variety.It says the recommended changes are estimated to reduce clearcutting from 65 per cent of all harvesting on Crown land to between 20 and 25 per cent.Lahey acknowledged that as a consequence there could be increased clearcutting on private land as industry deals with a reduction in wood supply.“It’s a recognition of the reality that 70 per cent of our land is owned by Nova Scotians,” said Lahey.But he said any adverse economic effects shouldn’t stop the province from better protecting Crown land and by extension privately owned woodlots.“I do not think the danger of contraction in the industry should be a rationale for not implementing the level of protection for ecosystems and biodiversity on Crown land that I say is warranted. Nor should it lead to a faint-hearted approach for over time moving as much private land management towards ecological forestry as possible.”About 90 per cent of wood harvested in Nova Scotia is clear cut, according to federal figures.But Lahey’s report says about 80 per cent of forest harvesting is done through clearcutting, with about 90 per cent done on private lands and 65 per cent carried out on Crown land. Lahey said about 18 per cent of all land in Nova Scotia is owned by forestry companies.Lands and Forestry Minister Iain Rankin gave no immediate reaction, saying the government would study the report before responding to any recommendations, including those that would reduce the percentage of clearcutting on Crown land.“Given what we are learning in his 40 recommendations and if they are fully incorporated we can’t really speculate on what the percentage will be,” said Rankin. “Obviously Nova Scotians were concerned and we are committed to make change.”The report calls for better ecological management and stricter overall enforcement by the province.However, it conspicuously omits any reference on whether the use of trees for biomass energy generation should continue.It also recommends that Crown licence holders be given access to public funding for the use of herbicide spraying to control competing species and to control the density of areas that are clear cut known as plantations.Lahey also dismisses any notion that Westfor, a conglomeration of companies in western Nova Scotia, has limited the access of private owners to markets for their wood.Announced nearly a year ago, Lahey’s review was originally due in February, but extensions were granted in order to complete the report and then to have it reviewed by advisors in international law and forestry economics.It was met with a decidedly mixed reaction from forest protection advocates and an industry representative on Tuesday.“I’m trying very hard to like this report,” said Ray Plourde, wilderness co-ordinator at the Halifax-based Ecology Action Centre.“I think that there are some good things in it and there are some things that have been left on the floor that haven’t been answered at all.”Plourde said the strong emphasis on the health of the forest ecosystem and biodiversity is “very commendable and appropriate,” as is the reduction of clearcutting on Crown land.However, Plourde said he was “absolutely gobsmacked and shocked” the report recommends spraying on Crown land after a previous review basically stopped the practice.“That is not going to go over well with the public who are absolutely sick of glyphosate spraying in this province.”Donna Crossland, co-author of a previous report on forestry that led into a 2011 natural resources strategy, said she like Plourde is not a “big fan” of the triad approach recommended by Lahey.“The public has never supported plantation forestry on our Crown lands … which is the reason why they want to bring about herbicide spraying,” said Crossland.She said she believes Premier Stephen McNeil was interested in “listening and doing the right thing” and she hopes the government will implement the recommendations that are “most appropriate in an expedient manner.”But Crossland said that can’t happen unless there is a change of attitude at the new Department of Lands and Forestry.“A lot of the impediment to change (previously) originated from the former Department of Natural Resources,” she said.Jeff Bishop, the executive director of Forest Nova Scotia, said while there are some good things in the report there are also things that “scare” him as a spokesman for the province’s forest industry.“It’s always a concern if we are talking about a lower wood supply,” said Bishop.He admitted that at this point he doesn’t know whether the overall recommendations will be good or bad for private land owners or the forestry industry as a whole.“We are going to have to dig in to the information they provided,” he said. read more